Forensic Case Files: 147 Years After The Battle of Antietam, A Union Solider Finally Comes Home

The young man was killed at the Battle of Antietam on the bloodiest day of fighting in American military history. Not yet out of his teenage years, he was struck down in Miller’s corn field on September 17, 1862, one of 23,000 men killed during a mere twelve hours of fighting. Hastily buried the next day, it was intended that his remains would be properly interred as befitting a soldier who died fighting for his country. But four years later, when the dead were collected and moved to the Antietam National Cemetery, his resting place at the edge of the corn field was missed. He lay undisturbed for another 142 years until his remains were discovered in October 2008.

It was a ground hog that made the discovery. As he tunneled under the corn field, he found human bones lodged in the earth and promptly removed them from his path. Luckily, a sharp-eyed visitor to the Antietam National Battlefield spotted a human jaw bone mixed into a pile of loose dirt beside the ground hog hole. Upon investigation, the National Parks staff discovered several more bone fragments, some scraps of leather and a Civil War era button in the same area. At that point, they knew they’d found an unmarked burial.

National Park Services’ archeologist Stephen Potter was called in to excavate the site.

Unfortunately, the ground hog had badly damaged the soldier’s bones as he gnawed on them for their calcium content. But along with the bones, Potter and his team found several items that provided crucial information about the missing soldier: A handful of buttons marked the solider as a member of one of the New York Regiments that fought at the battle of Antietam, and a cracked and tarnished belt plate bearing the stamp ‘U.S’ reinforced his identify as a Union soldier.

 

Forensic anthropologist Doug Owsley, head of the Division of Physical Anthropology at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, examined the recovered bones. Based on an impacted wisdom tooth in the jaw, lack of extensive dental wearing and an open suture in the skull, he judged the solider to have been between 17 and 19 years of age. But even for so young a man, he was clearly a veteran – mixed in among the New York regimental buttons were several general issue Union buttons, indicating that he’d been in the army long enough to require the generic replacement of his original buttons.

In the end, a final identification was not possible. Between the infantry, artillery and cavalry, 86 units from New York were present at Antietam that terrible day. Even when the list was narrowed to the 24 units fighting in the area of the corn field where the remains were discovered, there were simply too many men still listed as missing-in-action for a definitive ID.

He was brought back to New York in 2009. On September 17, 2009, on the 147th anniversary of his death, he was laid to rest at the Saratoga National Cemetery with full military honours. His identity lost forever to time, he is now simply the Unknown Soldier, ‘known but to God’.

 Photo credit: The Washington Post and Bill Schaaf

Forensics 101: Victim Age Determination Based on the Adult Pelvis

In one of my earlier Forensics 101 posts, I gave an overview of the different ways to determine the age of a skeletal victim. This process is much easier in children and teens as most of the major skeletal changes that occur during growth are ongoing until the early 20s. However, there are several ways to estimate age at death in an adult, and one of the most reliable is analysis of the pubic symphysis.

The pubic symphysis is the joint where the two halves of the pelvis meet at the centerline of the body, joined by a layer of fibrocartilage.

The bony symphyseal surface that faces the cartilage changes over time, starting at about age 20 and continuing past the age of 65.

The below sketch, based on the Suchey-Brooks method of identification, outlines the changes that take place over those 45 years. There are minor sex differences between males and females; the below sketch outlines the progression of an adult male over 5 – 10 year intervals and progressing through 6 phases:

Young bone is very robust, with a series of horizontal ridges and grooves. Over time, the bone changes from ridged and furrowed to flat and smooth with a fine grained texture. Margins build up at the edges to form a rim and a plateau develops in the center of the symphyseal surface at approximately age 35 (phase IV). After this, the surface erodes to become pitted and porous, and the shape becomes irregular. For the majority of the population, these changes occur at predictable age ranges, allowing an osteologist to estimate the age of an adult victim at the time of death.

The photo at the top of this post illustrates the extreme differences in the symphyseal surface over time. The bone on the left is from a young person of approximately 20 years of age. The bone on the right is from an older person of over 60 years of age.

After the recovery of skeletal or badly decomposed remains, basic markers such as age and sex are crucial to victim identification. Pubic symphysis analysis is simply one way a forensic anthropologist can determine victim age. If a full set of remains are recovered, it is preferable to analyze additional adult characteristics such as skull sutures and medial rib ends for a more accurate estimation.

Next week, I’ll be back with a new Forensic Case File– the story of a Union solider, quickly buried after the Battle of Antietam and lost to history for 146 years until his remains were uncovered by an overly ambitious groundhog. I hope to see you there…

Photo credit: Medscape and J.M. Suchey

Guest Post - Cozy Mystery? Huh?

This week we've got a treat for you. Agatha award winner and agency sister Amanda Flower has a new book out tomorrow - 'Murder in a Basket', the second installment in her India Hayes series. As the cozy mysteries Amanda writes are so different from our forensic thrillers, I asked her to explain what a cozy mystery is. Take it away, Amanda...

****************************************

Invariably when people find out I’m an author they ask the question, “What do you write.”

“Cozy mysteries,” I reply.

Outside of the world of mystery fiction this response is rewarded with a frown, a confused expression, or blank stare because “cozy mystery” is one heck of an oxymoron.

“Don’t characters die in your books?” They may ask.

“Yes, they do. Sometimes more than one person per book.”

“Then how is that cozy?” The confused person asks. “Death doesn’t remind me of a cuddly blanket, which is what I think of when I picture cozy.”

That’s a great point, which is why I’m sharing the characteristics of cozy mysteries, using illustrations from my new mystery Murder in a Basket, the second in the India Hayes series.

The Characteristics of a cozy mystery

1) The death takes place off page. The novels include little violence. The heroes or heroines may be in jeopardy during the climax, but for the most part, they are not in any real danger.

In Murder in a Basket, India discovered the dead body of basket weaver Tess Ross. Tess has been dead for a short time when India finds her. The description of Tess’s body is minimal. India is in danger during the climax, but that’s all I’ll tell you about that. I can’t give the ending away!

2) The protagonist has an occupation other than police officer or private detective. The protagonist may be anything from a chef to an actor to a student.

India is a college librarian and aspiring painter. Her occupations couldn’t be farther from law enforcement.

3) The protagonist is pulled into the mystery because of his/her relationship with the victim or the accused. The protagonist is generally reluctant to solve the crime.

India becomes involved in the murder investigation because Tess is the mother of one of the student workers in the library. He asks for India’s help. India agrees, but she’s not particularly enthusiastic about it.

4) Minor characters (friends, family, coworkers) from the protagonist’s own life play significant roles in the plot.

Ahh well, I have many minor characters who like to take over my India Hayes stories from India’s hippy parents to her Irish-centric landlady to her super-mom older sister. They all help and hinder India’s investigation in their own special way.

Of course, these are just guidelines and not hard and fast rules. That’s what makes writing fiction fun. Guidelines are meant to be bent if not broken all the way through.

Jen, thanks for letting me stop by Skelton Keys!

********************************************************************************

Amanda Flower writes the India Hayes Mystery Series. The first novel in the series, MAID OF MURDER, was nominated for an Agatha Award. The sequel, MURDER IN A BASKET, releases February 8, 2012. A PLAIN DEATH, first in a new Amish mystery series, releases July 2012. To learn more visit Amanda online at http://www.amandaflower.com/. You can also follow Amanda at http://www.facebook.com/authoramandaflower and http://twitter.com/aflowerwriter.