Forensic Case Files: 9th Century Remains of King Alfred Discovered?

It seems like English kings are popping up all over the place recently. A few weeks ago I shared the story of King Richard III’s positively identified remains in Leicester. Shortly after that story broke, Ann (who is always my best resource) found a story about archeologists in Winchester who believed remains found in an unmarked grave are those of King Alfred the Great (849 – 899 A.D.).

Following the death of his three older brothers, Alfred took the throne at twenty-two. Over the course of his reign, he became best known for keeping the Viking invasion at bay, thus ensuring English as the country’s spoken language and Christianity as its religion. First called the King of Wessex (an area of southwestern England), he was successful at repelling the Danish invaders in his own kingdom before recapturing London from the Danes and making peace with their leader, Guthrum. Known afterwards as the first King of the English, Alfred was also responsible for introducing new military responses to specifically counter new Danish strategies, significantly improving England’s naval power, introducing the country’s first written code of law, and introducing a standard system of coins.

Following his death in 899 A.D. from natural causes (possibly Crohn’s Disease), Alfred was buried in first in Winchester, a city in the south of England. Later, his remains were transferred to the newly opened Hyde Abbey in 1110, along with the remains of his wife and children. In 1539, during Henry VIII's dissolution of all Catholic abbeys and monasteries, Hyde Abbey was demolished, but the graves were left intact. In the eighteenth century, the graves were robbed and stripped of all contents, and later excavations showed Alfred’s grave to be empty.

In the late 1800’s, a vicar at St. Bartholomew’s Church in Winchester paid ten shillings for a collection of bones rumoured to have originated at Hyde Abbey. These bones, including five skulls, where interred at St. Bartholomew’s Church until archeologists recently identified the remains as possibly belonging to King Alfred the Great.

This archaeological team will face challenges that Richard III’s team did not, including:

  • Multiple individuals interred in the same grave—a forensic anthropologist will be able to determine sex from some bones, relative height from others, and will try to separate each individual’s remains.
  • Age of the remains—King Alfred’s remains are six centuries older than those of Richard III, and the chances of extracting viable DNA are much smaller. Scientists have been trying to recover DNA from Alfred’s granddaughter's remains, but have not yet been successful.
  • No known living relative—Genealogy before the turn of the first millennium was not documented as it was after Richard III. If Alfred’s family line continues to this day, his relatives are most likely unaware of the connection.
  • Radiocarbon dating is probably the best chance to age match the remains.

The team will begin excavating the remains during spring 2013 and hopes to have results by summer.

It's Goodreads giveaway time! Five Star is giving away 10 copies to American entrants, ending on March 25, 2013: http://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/41803-dead-without-a-stone-to-tell-it

Photo credit: Odejea via Wikimedia Commons

The Valentine Challenge—Marisa Cleveland's Debut Novella

I’m thrilled to help long time writing bud and agency sister, Marisa Cleveland (and the Seymour Agency's newest agent extraordinaire), celebrate her first release by taking part in her blog tour. Best of all, there are three great prizes to be won and multiple entries allowed, so leave a comment here and visit the other participating blogs to increase your chances of winning!


Marisa Cleveland's novella, The Valentine Challenge, debuted from Entangled Publishing! Join the celebration by visiting participating blogs and commenting the answer to this question: In your opinion, what's the sexiest part of a man?  

Between now and February 28th, Marisa's super-secret judges will browse the blogs and choose up to three winners to receive Valentine goodies! 

No purchase necessary, but a Like on Amazon is always appreciated!

Title: The Valentine Challenge
Author: Marisa Cleveland
Publisher: Entangled Publishing (Flirt)
Genre: Contemporary Romance Novella

Book Description: When Stacey Bradford's hot boss convinces his company's board to close her best friend's flower shop - days before Valentine's Day! - Stacey declares war.

Intrigued by Stacey's devotion to her friend, the hearts and flowers holiday, and belief in true love, Marsh issues a challenge - prove love exists or deliver the closing documents to her friend herself.

Stacey never could resist a challenge, but when Marsh makes Valentine's Day the deadline for their deal, Stacey must decide how far she's willing to go...for love.

Author Bio: Marisa Cleveland loves to laugh, hates to cry, and does both often. As a writer, she writes. Every day. Perhaps because she married her best friend, her adult romance novels focus on playfully naughty relationships developed through friendship and family-oriented values. She loves to connect with writers and readers.

Author Links:
Website and blog: www.marisacleveland.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/marisacleveland
Facebook: www.facebook.com/marisacleveland00

Super Amazing Participating Blogs:
http://amandaflower.wordpress.com/
http://amielouellen.com/
http://www.bethvrabel.com/
http://katemeader.com/blog/
http://www.kateserine.com/blog/
http://jamieayres.com/
/
http://www.jennysulpizio.com/
http://nocturnalreadings.blogspot.com/
http://lynnetteaustin.blogspot.com/
http://www.sarahgagnon.com/
http://sonyaweiss.com/
http://tonyakuper.blogspot.com/

Come on guys, let's see those answers! And be sure to visit any of the other participating blogs because we've all got more than one answer to this question.


It's Goodreads giveaway time! Five Star is giving away 10 copies to American entrants, ending on March 25, 2013: http://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/41803-dead-without-a-stone-to-tell-it

Congratulations to Heather, who won the recently closed Canadian Goodreads giveaway. Keep your eye on this space—more giveaways coming soon!


Updated! Congratulations to Jenny who commented and won a prize from Marisa! Enjoy your goodie bag!

Why do we read?

I finished the novel GONE GIRL last week. It took me a while to find time to read it, but I was curious because I’d heard a lot about it and knew it was critically acclaimed. But almost immediately I knew this wasn’t my kind of book. I finished it, but I admit to having to take a break about a third of the way into it. Now that I’m done, I can’t actually say that I enjoyed it. It was a solid story, but the gritty portrayal of the protagonists’ marriage, and the nastiness and betrayals were just not fun to experience with them. It was dark and disturbing and unsettling. Kudos to Gillian Flynn for bringing her readers along for the ride, but, for me, life is heavy enough without that kind of realism invading my brief and precious entertainment space.

However, it made me think about why we read. In the end, I stuck with GONE GIRL just to finish the book, not because I liked the characters or was enjoying the story. But when it comes to the main types of books we read, why do we do it?

  • Escapism: Sometimes real life can be overwhelming, and you just want to get away from the bills, work projects, raising teenagers and everything else reality throws your way. So losing yourself in another world—be it a happily-ever-after romance, the worldbuilding of a fantasy novel, or immersion in a terrifying horror tale—can be a welcome break from reality.
  • To learn something: This is why I love historical fiction of any kind. I always come out of a novel like that having learned something new about a culture, a place or a time in history.
  • To engage the brain: This is one reason I’ve always been drawn to murder mysteries. My brain doesn’t turn off well at the best of times, but when I read fiction like this, I’m always on the lookout for clues and constantly trying to solve the crime before the investigator.
  • To safely explore emotional themes in a manner where no one is actually harmed: Many things happen in fiction that we’d never want to personally experience—rape, murder, losing a child, or navigating the breakup of a marriage, for example. Experiencing tragedy through someone else’s eyes gives us a window into what it really might feel like without experiencing the loss ourselves.
  • Emotional satisfaction: Many times, the world simply doesn’t work in ways we’d like to see and experience—often there isn’t justice for evil, and good is not always rewarded. Fiction can give us a way to right the wrongs we see in real life and to experience the emotional satisfaction that comes from justice well served.
  • An interruptible and resumable process: Reading is something that we can do on our own time schedule. No need to watch the clock or set a DVR. Fall asleep during your favourite TV show and you’ve missed something and have to scramble to catch up. Fall asleep while reading and your book waits for you.
  • A renewable process: You can reread your favourite books time and again, often gaining new insight by doing so. Books have layers that peel away to reveal new information when you have the foresight of knowing how the book ends. As a result, sometimes books can be more enjoyable on a second read.

Something occurred to Ann and I while we were coming up with this list: from our perspective, many of these reasons are also why we write—especially around the concepts of emotional justice, learning new concepts and exploring emotional themes.

These are our reasons to read. How about you guys—have we missed any of your favourite reasons to read or do you agree with our list?

Photo credit: Alexandre Dulaunoy


It's Goodreads giveaway time! Win an ARC of DEAD, WITHOUT A STONE TO TELL IT in one of two ways:

1) Five Star is giving away 10 copies to American entrants, ending on March 25, 2013: http://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/41803-dead-without-a-stone-to-tell-it

2) I'm giving away an authorgraphed ARC to Canadian entrants until February 18th (with more North American giveaways coming soon): http://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/44027-dead-without-a-stone-to-tell-it

Forensic Case Files: Richard III’s Remains Confirmed

On August 25, 2012, the Richard III Society, the University of Leicester Archeology Department and the Leicester City Council made an astounding announcement. Their joint efforts to find the remains of King Richard III had led them to a local municipal parking lot. The three trenches dug there not only revealed the walls from the Greyfriars Church in which Richard was said to be buried, but also a set of human remains—remains with a curious curvature to the spine and signs of violent, battle-related death. They proposed that this skeleton was the remains of Richard III, the last English monarch to die in battle, but they needed time to definitively prove his identification.

We covered this story last fall when the remains were finally excavated, and in the following posts concerning Richard’s supposed (and unproven) treachery in killing his nephews, the Princes in the Tower, and outlining the science that could ultimately prove Richard’s identity.

Yesterday, it was announced that ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, the remains recovered were indeed those of King Richard III. It took the team over four months of intense testing using the tools of DNA analysis, forensic anthropological examination, carbon dating and environmental analysis to make this determination.

This is the evidence to support Richard’s identification:

  • Despite fears that nucleic acids within the bones might be too degraded after more than 500 years in the ground, DNA was successfully recovered from the teeth. Independent testing in Leicester and York confirmed the mitochondrial DNA match between the remains and Michael Ibsen of London, Ontario, a direct descendant of Anne of York, sister of the king. A second descendant was also found; this too was a match.
  • Carbon dating placed the remains between 1450 and 1540. Richard died at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485.
  • Examination of the remains by a forensic anthropologist determined them to be from an individual in his late twenties or early thirties. At the time of his death, Richard was 32.
  • Radiocarbon dating revealed that the individual had consumed a high protein diet. Meat consumption in the fifteenth century was rare, except by those of high social status. 
  • There were ten injuries to the skull, including two fatal wounds by a sword and a halberd (a pole topped by a spiked axe). The latter removed a large chunk of the back of the skull.
  • The remains showed signs of severe scoliosis, which would present as the right shoulder sitting higher than the left. However, both arms appeared normal, in opposition to the Tudor portrayal of Richard as a ‘hunchback with a withered arm’.
  • Body positioning of the remains suggests that the hands were tied, as a prisoners’ might be.
  • The body was interred in a hastily dug grave. It was not long enough, causing the head to tip up so the body could fit. There was also no shroud or any grave artifacts. This careless treatment suggests burial at the hands of the victors of the battle and not those loyal to the Plantagenet cause or its king.

Richard’s remains will be re-interred at Leicester Cathedral. Next up for the Richard III society is to restore Richard’s tarnished reputation. Is it all a result of the victorious Tudor’s and their re-telling of history, or was any of it truth? This will be a challenge as they have centuries of belief to overcome.

For anyone wanting more information about Richard, the search for his remains and how they confirmed his identity, the University of Leicester has set up an excellent website containing all the information they now know: The Search for Richard III – Completed

Photo credit: The University of Leicester

It's Goodreads giveaway time! Win an ARC of DEAD, WITHOUT A STONE TO TELL IT in one of two ways:

1) Five Star is giving away 10 copies to American entrants, ending on March 25, 2013: http://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/41803-dead-without-a-stone-to-tell-it

2) I'm giving away an authorgraphed ARC to Canadian entrants starting today and going until February 18th (with more North American giveaways coming soon): http://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/44027-dead-without-a-stone-to-tell-it